INVESTIGACION

---

1. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/19/www-opencorporates-com/

• The Standard Model: The doctrine for OpenCorporates is to use its global open database to conduct in-depth investigations of corporate structures. The model involves searching for a target company, then systematically mapping out its entire corporate tree, including parent companies, subsidiaries, branch offices, and registered agents, using the interconnected data to trace networks of ownership and control across multiple jurisdictions.
• Customisation for the RADON CASE: This model is applied directly to the Spanish construction and real estate sectors. The strategy is to conduct a full corporate mapping of the largest players (e.g., ACS, Acciona, Ferrovial, Sacyr, Metrovacesa, Neinor Homes). The objective is to identify all their domestic and international subsidiaries. This comprehensive map will be used to ensure legal notices for the collective action are served to every relevant corporate entity, to identify potential conflicts of interest, and to understand the full scale of the corporate actors who have benefited from the lack of radon regulation.

---

2. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/19/os/ (linking to OpenSanctions)

• The Standard Model: The standard procedure for OpenSanctions is to use its global database of sanctions lists, politically exposed persons (PEPs), and other persons of interest as a critical due diligence tool.¹ The model involves searching for both individuals and corporate entities to check for any red flags that might indicate connections to illicit activities, corruption, or sanctions violations.²
• Customisation for the RADON CASE: The model is customized for due diligence on the key actors in Spain. The search will target the board members and executive leadership of the major Spanish construction firms identified via OpenCorporates. Additionally, we will search for the names of high-ranking officials in the Spanish ministries responsible for housing, health, and industry. The objective is to produce a due diligence report that confirms whether any key players are on sanctions lists or are listed as PEPs, which is essential for understanding political connections and mitigating future risks to the case.

---

3. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/19/www-stealthconsolidation/

• The Standard Model: The standard model for this resource is to apply its conceptual framework of “stealth consolidation” to a target market. This involves looking beyond major, publicly-announced mergers to identify a pattern of smaller, under-the-radar acquisitions and company failures that lead to a gradual increase in market concentration and a decrease in competition over time.
• Customisation for the RADON CASE: The framework is applied to the Spanish construction and environmental remediation/testing sectors. The strategy is to use data gathered from business registries and news archives to analyze the rate of company formation, acquisition, and failure in these sectors over the last decade. The objective is to build a narrative, supported by data, that the state’s failure to regulate radon has created a market where only large, entrenched players can survive, thereby stifling the growth of a competitive market for specialized safety and remediation services.

---

4. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/19/nac-sic-gpt/

• The Standard Model: The doctrine for a NACE/SIC code classification tool is to use it as a foundational step in any sectoral investigation. The model involves inputting a company’s name or business description to receive its precise Standard Industrial Classification code, ensuring that all subsequent searches on official statistical or business databases are accurate and comprehensive.
• Customisation for the RADON CASE: This model is applied to ensure analytical precision. The strategy is to use the tool to get the definitive Spanish/EU economic activity codes (CNAE) for every company of interest. We will specifically identify the codes for “Construction of residential buildings” (CNAE 41.21), “Real estate development” (CNAE 41.10), “Real estate agencies” (CNAE 68.31), and “Technical testing and analysis” (CNAE 71.20). This definitive list of codes is mandatory for conducting accurate, filtered searches on platforms like Eurostat and the Spanish business registries.

---

5. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/19/www-globaltradealert-org/

• The Standard Model: The standard procedure for Global Trade Alert is to use its database to monitor state interventions that affect trade. The model involves searching for a specific country and sector to identify protectionist measures, subsidies, or other government policies that could create an unfair advantage for domestic industries.
• Customisation for the RADON CASE: This model is customized to search for state interventions that exacerbate the radon problem. We will search the database for any Spanish government subsidies, grants, or tax breaks provided to the housing and construction sectors. The objective is to identify instances where the state has actively provided financial incentives for the construction of new housing without any corresponding requirement for radon safety checks. This evidence would counter any defense of passive ignorance and instead build a case of active, financially-supported negligence.

---

6. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/?direct_file=... (specific internal files)

• The Standard Model: The doctrine for an internal file link is that it represents a piece of proprietary, pre-compiled evidence or analysis that is core to the case. The model requires that this internal asset be located and its contents fully integrated into the broader investigation strategy.
• Customisation for the RADON CASE: For the Radon Case, these internal files (e.g., NIPO_20__Methodology.pdf) represent foundational pillars of the project. The strategy is to treat them as the source of our primary claims. For example, the methodology PDF would be the basis for our scientific and economic damage calculations, while an internal spreadsheet would contain the detailed workings of the €23.97 billion damage estimate. They are not platforms for searching, but source documents to be defended and evidenced by the external search results.

---

7. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/19/www-mayerbrown/

• The Standard Model: The COCOO-Mayer Brown Doctrine is a strategic model for competitor and adversary intelligence. The model involves treating the public-facing thought leadership (articles, client alerts) of a major law firm not as a database, but as a source of strategic intelligence to understand how sophisticated legal opponents frame arguments and view legal risks in a particular sector.
• Customisation for the RADON CASE: For this case, the adversary is the Spanish state. The model is therefore customized to anticipate the state’s legal defense. The strategy is to search Mayer Brown’s publications for keywords like "sovereign liability", "state responsibility", "EU law infringement", and "mass tort defense". The objective is to build a “red team” report that outlines the most likely legal arguments the Spanish government’s lawyers will use, allowing COCOO to prepare counter-arguments and strengthen its case preemptively.

---

8. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/19/www-companieshouse/

• The Standard Model: The COCOO-Companies House Doctrine is a model for using the UK’s official company register for strategic sectoral analysis. It emphasizes using the Advanced Search function, particularly filtering by SIC code, to dissect an entire industry, identify all players, and detect market trends like consolidation.
• Customisation for the RADON CASE: The model is customized for benchmarking and identifying cross-border actors. The strategy has two prongs. First, we will use the advanced search to identify all UK companies with the SIC code for “environmental consulting” or “remediation services” to create a directory of potential expert witnesses. Second, we will search for any major Spanish construction firms that have a registered UK entity. We will then compare the list of company directors in the UK with the Spanish parent company to identify key individuals with cross-jurisdictional responsibilities.

---

9. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/19/rns-oc-os/

• The Standard Model: The COCOO-LSE Doctrine outlined here is a model for using the London Stock Exchange’s data for real-time market intelligence. The core is to monitor the Regulatory News Service (RNS) for early signals of corporate action. The OC-OS part of the doctrine signifies that any significant RNS finding immediately triggers a follow-up investigation using OpenCorporates (OC) and OpenSanctions (OS).
• Customisation for the RADON CASE: The model is customized to focus on UK-listed firms with Spanish exposure. We will set up alerts on the RNS for any company identified in our previous searches as having significant Spanish real estate or construction interests. Any announcement mentioning their Spanish operations (e.g., asset write-downs, new investments, comments on market conditions) will immediately trigger the OC-OS pipeline to check for corresponding changes in their corporate structure or for any new sanctions-related intelligence on their directors.

---

10. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/19/www-sede-registradores-org/

• The Standard Model: The doctrine for the Spanish Registradores ecosystem is to use its three main components in conjunction. First, the core registry (sede.registradores.org) is used to pull basic details and official filings on a specific company. Second, the Estadísticas Mercantiles portal is used to analyze aggregated financial data for an entire sector (filtered by CNAE code). Third, the Ratios Sectoriales portal from the Banco de España is used to get detailed financial health ratios for that sector.
• Customisation for the RADON CASE: This model is applied directly and is fundamental to the case. We will first use the core registry to pull the full company profiles (Nota Simple) for our target list of Spanish construction firms. We will then use the statistics portal, filtered by the relevant CNAE codes (e.g., 41.21, 41.10), to get an official, aggregated view of the financial scale of the entire sector. Finally, we will use the financial ratios portal to analyze the overall economic health and vulnerability of the sector, which supports our damage calculations.

---

11. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/19/www-sec-edgar/

• The Standard Model: The standard model for the SEC EDGAR database is to search the filings of US-publicly traded companies to gather financial data, identify corporate strategies, and find disclosures of material risks. Key documents are the 10-K (annual report), 10-Q (quarterly report), and 8-K (material events).
• Customisation for the RADON CASE: The model is customized to find evidence from non-US companies that have a US listing. The strategy is to identify any major Spanish construction, banking, or insurance firms (e.g., Banco Santander, Ferrovial) that are traded on a US exchange. We will then conduct a full-text search of their SEC filings (10-K, 20-F for foreign issuers) for keywords "Spain", "radon", "environmental liability", "real estate risk", and "regulatory compliance". The objective is to find any risk disclosures made to US investors that are not as prominent in their Spanish-language reporting.

---

12. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/19/www-globalspec-com/

• The Standard Model: The standard model for GlobalSpec, an engineering and industrial products search engine, is to identify the technical specifications, manufacturers, and “state of the art” for specific industrial products and components.
• Customisation for the RADON CASE: The model is applied to prove the feasibility of the proposed solution. We will use the platform to search for all commercially available technologies for “radon detection,” “radon measurement,” “air quality testing,” and “sub-slab depressurization systems.” The objective is to compile a technical dossier of existing, off-the-shelf solutions. This dossier will be used as evidence to counter any potential argument from the Spanish state that implementing a nationwide remediation program is technically unfeasible or requires technology that is not readily available.

---

13. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/19/www-trade-ec-europa-eu/

• The Standard Model: The doctrine for the EU’s Access to Markets portal is to provide businesses with information on trade conditions. The model involves searching for a specific country and product/service to find information on tariffs, customs procedures, and, crucially, non-tariff barriers to trade.
• Customisation for the RADON CASE: This model is customized to identify Spain’s regulatory failure as a non-tariff barrier. The strategy is to search for rules and regulations for “construction services” and “environmental testing services” in Spain. We will then argue that the absence of a mandatory radon regulation framework constitutes a barrier, as it creates market uncertainty and disadvantages companies from other EU countries where such standards are the norm. This intelligence supports the parallel legal strategy of lodging a formal complaint with the Commission.

---

14. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/20/www-showvoc-op-europa-eu/

• The Standard Model: The standard model for this EU vocabularies platform is to use it as a reference tool to ensure the use of correct, official EU terminology in legal and technical documents. It allows searching for official definitions and translations of concepts across all EU languages.
• Customisation for the RADON CASE: This model is applied as a foundational step for ensuring legal precision. The strategy is to search for and verify the official definitions and taxonomies for terms like "ionising radiation", "reference level", "remediation", "public health", and "environmental harm" as defined within the Eurovoc thesaurus. This ensures that all legal submissions and expert reports produced for the Radon Case use the precise, official terminology of the EU institutions, preventing any ambiguity or definitional challenges.

---

15. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/19/www-eurostat/

• The Standard Model: The standard procedure for using Eurostat, the EU’s statistical office, is to extract large-scale, credible datasets to provide a quantitative, macroeconomic context for a specific issue. The model involves searching its databases by theme, country, and time period to build statistical evidence.
• Customisation for the RADON CASE: The model is applied to provide the quantitative backbone for the entire claim. We will query the Eurostat databases for Spanish-specific data on several key indicators: new residential construction rates, public health statistics (specifically lung cancer incidence and mortality rates), housing stock details (age, type), and economic indicators for the construction sector. This official data will be used to build models that directly support the €23.97 billion damage calculation and to demonstrate the immense scale of the public health and economic problem.

---

16. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/19/www-usp-wpi/

• The Standard Model: The doctrine for using a major patent database like the Derwent World Patents Index (WPI) is to investigate the global innovation landscape for a specific technology. The model involves using keyword and classification code searches to identify all relevant patents, the companies that own them, and the jurisdictions where they are protected.
• Customisation for the RADON CASE: The model is applied to demonstrate the maturity of remediation technology. The strategy is to conduct a global patent search for all technologies related to “radon mitigation,” “radon testing,” and “soil gas depressurization.” The objective is twofold: first, to create a report showing the vast number and age of existing technological solutions, proving their maturity and availability. Second, to specifically check if Spanish companies have filed such patents, with a lack of filings indicating that the regulatory failure has suppressed domestic innovation.

---

17. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/19/www-violationtrackeruk/

• The Standard Model: The standard procedure for Violation Tracker UK is to use its database of corporate misconduct to build a “rap sheet” on a target company. The model involves searching for a company name to find its history of regulatory breaches in the UK, including employment tribunals, health and safety convictions, and environmental notices.
• Customisation for the RADON CASE: The model is customized for comparative corporate analysis. The strategy is to search the database for any of the major Spanish construction firms that have a significant operational presence in the UK (e.g., Ferrovial). The objective is to find their UK compliance history. A report showing that a company adheres to high health and safety standards in the regulated UK market provides a powerful contrast to their practices in the unregulated Spanish market, supporting the argument that corporate behavior is a function of state enforcement.

---

18. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/19/www-cat/

• The Standard Model: The standard model for using the UK’s Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) archives is to find direct legal precedents for competition law cases, focusing on how the Tribunal has interpreted specific sections of competition legislation.
• Customisation for the RADON CASE: The model is adapted to search for precedents on legal principle rather than on fact. The strategy is to search the CAT’s case archive not for radon cases, but for judicial reviews of regulator decisions or cases that hinged on the interpretation of an EU directive. The objective is to find judgments that discuss the duties of a public body under EU-derived law and the standard of review for regulatory inaction. This provides jurisprudential arguments that can be cited persuasively in the Spanish legal proceedings.

---

19. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/19/www-cma-gov-uk/

• The Standard Model: The doctrine for using the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) website is to find information on ongoing market investigations, merger decisions, and, crucially, the CMA’s official guidance on how it interprets its legal duties.
• Customisation for the RADON CASE: The model is customized for benchmarking best practices. The strategy is to search the CMA’s website for any and all guidance documents it has published regarding consumer protection, public health considerations in markets, and its duties to enforce safety-related regulations. The objective is to compile a report detailing how a best-in-class, independent regulator defines its responsibilities. This report will be used as a “gold standard” benchmark to highlight the profound failures of the corresponding Spanish state bodies.

---

20. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/19/www-dgcomp/

• The Standard Model: The standard model for the European Commission’s DG COMP website is to search its case archives for precedents in EU competition law, particularly merger control and state aid decisions.
• Customisation for the RADON CASE: The model is adapted to focus on a different area of DG COMP’s parent body’s responsibility: infringement proceedings. The strategy is to search the Commission’s wider databases (linked from DG COMP’s site) for all historical infringement proceedings launched against Spain, or any other member state, for failure to correctly implement environmental or public health directives. The objective is to find legal documents and press releases that show how the Commission legally constructs such cases, providing a template for COCOO’s own arguments.

---

21. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/19/www-bailii/

• The Standard Model: The standard model for using the British and Irish Legal Information Institute (BAILII) is to conduct free, broad searches for UK and Irish case law to find legal precedents.
• Customisation for the RADON CASE: The model is applied to find persuasive, common-law authority on the core legal principles of the case. The strategy is to conduct a detailed search for UK case law on the “tort of negligence by a public body” and “breach of statutory duty,” specifically in cases involving a public health risk. The objective is to create a legal brief of supporting precedents that, while not binding in Spain, can be presented to the Spanish court to demonstrate how a similar legal system has dealt with the question of state liability.

---

22. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/19/www-eur-lex/

• The Standard Model: The standard procedure for EUR-Lex is to use it as the definitive source for all official EU legal documents, including treaties, directives, regulations, and court judgments.³
• Customisation for the RADON CASE: This model is applied directly and is non-negotiable for establishing the primary evidence. The strategy is twofold. First, to download the full, consolidated text of Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom in all relevant languages. Second, and most critically, to download the complete, official judgment from the Court of Justice of the European Union in case C-384/22. These two documents form the immutable legal foundation upon which the entire Radon Case is built.

---

23. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/19/www-uks-business-and-property-courts/

• The Standard Model: The model for using the archives of the UK’s specialist Business and Property Courts is to search for judgments in high-value, complex commercial disputes that may provide precedents.
• Customisation for the RADON CASE: The model is adapted to find cases based on legal principle. The strategy is to search the court’s case archives for any disputes that touch upon damages arising from non-compliance with statutory duties or regulatory failure in a commercial context (e.g., environmental contamination cases). The objective is to find judicial reasoning on how damages are calculated in complex cases of negligence, which can inform the financial models for our own claim.

---

24. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/20/www-companieshouse-find-company-info/ (Advanced Search)

• The Standard Model: The model for the Companies House advanced search is to combine multiple filters (e.g., location, incorporation date, company status, SIC code) to isolate very specific cohorts of companies for analysis.
• Customisation for the RADON CASE: The model is customized to find highly specific UK companies for benchmarking and expertise. The strategy is to use the advanced search to filter for all active UK companies with an SIC code for “Testing and measurement” or “Environmental consulting services” that were incorporated more than 10 years ago. This will create a vetted list of experienced, credible firms that could be approached to act as expert witnesses on the technical and commercial feasibility of a nationwide radon testing program.

---

25. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/20/www-ukparl-interest-disclosures/

• The Standard Model: The standard model for the UK Parliament’s Register of Members’ Financial Interests is to search for the disclosures of specific politicians or to search across the register for mentions of specific companies to identify potential conflicts of interest or channels of corporate influence.
• Customisation for the RADON CASE: This model is applied for contextual political intelligence. The strategy is to search the register for any declared interests (shareholdings, directorships) held by UK MPs in the major construction or real estate firms with operations in Spain. The objective is not to find a direct link to radon, but to map the political affiliations and networks of the key corporate players, which provides valuable context for the overall case.

---

26. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/19/www-ec-europa-eu-haveyoursay/

• The Standard Model: The standard procedure for the EU’s “Have Your Say” portal is to search its archives for past public consultations and citizen feedback initiatives related to a specific piece of legislation or policy area.
• Customisation for the RADON CASE: This model is applied to find prior warnings and build a history of the issue. The strategy is to search the portal meticulously for any past consultations, feedback, or petitions related to Directive 2013/59/Euratom, radiation safety, or environmental health in Spain. The objective is to find and document any evidence submitted by other NGOs, professional bodies, or citizen groups that raised concerns about Spain’s implementation of the radon directive. This would prove that the state was put on notice of the problem long before our legal action.

---

27. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/19/www-caselaw-nationalarchives-gov-uk/

• The Standard Model: The model for the UK’s National Archives case law service is to use it as a primary source for finding significant historical judgments and legal records, particularly those that have set major precedents.
• Customisation for the RADON CASE: The model is applied to find foundational UK legal precedents on state liability. The strategy will be to search for seminal cases concerning the tort of negligence by a public authority, particularly landmark House of Lords or Supreme Court rulings that defined the scope of a government’s “duty of care” to its citizens in matters of public safety. The objective is to build a brief of the most powerful supporting case law from a leading common law jurisdiction.

---

28. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/20/www-consult-lobbyist-reg-uk/ and www-scot-lobby-reg

• The Standard Model: The standard model for the UK and Scottish lobbying registers is to search for lobbying activities undertaken by specific companies or targeting specific government departments to map patterns of corporate influence.
• Customisation for the RADON CASE: The model is applied for comparative corporate profiling. The strategy is to search these registers for any lobbying activities conducted by the major Spanish construction firms with UK operations. We will look for their engagement on topics like environmental regulations or building standards. A report showing that these firms actively lobby on safety standards in the UK provides a stark contrast to the situation in Spain and helps build a narrative about their corporate priorities.

---

29. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/19/www-casetracker-gov-uk/

• The Standard Model: The standard model for a government case tracker is to monitor the progress of specific ongoing government projects, investigations, or legal cases.
• Customisation for the RADON CASE: This model is applied for benchmarking project management and transparency. We will search the UK’s Casetracker system for examples of large-scale public health or environmental remediation projects. The objective is to analyze and report on the typical timelines, budgets, stakeholder engagement processes, and public reporting standards for such a project in the UK. This provides a clear, practical model of responsible governance that can be contrasted with the administrative vacuum in Spain.

---

30. Searchlink: https://www.hl.co.uk/funds and https://www.ajbell.co.uk/markets

• The Standard Model: The standard model for using investment platforms like Hargreaves Lansdown and AJ Bell is to utilize their fund and share screening tools to identify which institutional investors and asset managers have significant holdings in specific companies or sectors.
• Customisation for the RADON CASE: The model is applied to map the key financial stakeholders. The strategy is to use the screeners to identify all UK and European investment funds with a stated focus on Iberian real estate or with significant holdings in the major Spanish construction firms. The objective is to create a list of the key asset managers who have a fiduciary duty to manage risk. This intelligence can be used to open a dialogue with these powerful investors, making them aware of the systemic radon liability they may be exposed to.

---

31. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/19/www-causelist-gov-uk/

• The Standard Model: The standard model for a court’s Cause List is to perform daily checks to monitor the scheduling of upcoming hearings, judicial assignments, and the progress of active litigation.
• Customisation for the RADON CASE: This model is applied for case management and monitoring, not primary research. The strategy is to have this platform on a watch list. Should any part of the Radon Case (e.g., an enforcement action) reach the UK courts, or if related cases appear, this platform would be checked daily to track all procedural developments.

---

32. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/19/www-find-tender-service-gov-uk/ and www-contractsfinder-gov-uk

• The Standard Model: The standard procedure for UK public procurement portals is to search for past and present tender opportunities to understand government purchasing patterns, identify competitors, and find contract award notices which contain details on value and scope.
• Customisation for the RADON CASE: The model is applied for crucial financial benchmarking. The strategy is to conduct an exhaustive search of these portals for every public contract related to “radon testing,” “radon remediation,” and “radiological assessment.” The objective is to compile a detailed database of real-world contract values and work specifications. This data will be used to create an evidence-based, highly credible budget for the public-private partnership COCOO is proposing for Spain.

---

33. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/19/www-lobbyfacts-eu/

• The Standard Model: The doctrine for LobbyFacts.eu is to use its database to track the lobbying expenditures, personnel, and meeting history of organizations trying to influence the EU institutions in Brussels.⁴
• Customisation for the RADON CASE: This model is applied directly to the key Spanish corporate actors. The strategy is to search for the profiles of all major Spanish construction firms (ACS, Ferrovial, etc.) and their primary trade associations (e.g., SEOPAN, CEOE). The objective is to analyze who they have been meeting with at the European Commission and what their declared lobbying interests are. Discovering lobbying activities aimed at weakening or delaying environmental or safety regulations would be a critical finding for the case.

---

34. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/20/ec-commissioners-discl/

• The Standard Model: The standard procedure for the European Commissioners’ disclosures is to review their public declarations of interest to check for any potential conflicts of interest.
• Customisation for the RADON CASE: This model is applied as a standard but essential due diligence check. The strategy is to review the declarations of the Commissioners for Health (DG SANTE), Environment (DG ENV), and the Single Market (DG GROW), looking for any past or present financial ties or affiliations to the Spanish construction and real estate industries. The objective is to ensure the political integrity of the process and to identify any potential biases at the highest level of the Commission.

---

35. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/20/www-eu-fundstenders/

• The Standard Model: The standard model for the EU’s main Funding & Tenders Portal is to search for large-scale grant and contract opportunities funded by the EU budget.⁵
• Customisation for the RADON CASE: The model is customized to investigate the past use of EU funds by Spain. The strategy is to search the portal’s archives for any major regional development, structural, or environmental funds awarded to Spanish public bodies. The objective is to see if Spain has received significant EU funding that could and should have been allocated to address a known environmental health risk like radon. Evidence that such funds were misallocated or used for projects that ignored the radon risk would dramatically strengthen the case for state negligence.

---

36. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/20/www-wto-disp-settlement/

• The Standard Model: The model for the WTO Dispute Settlement database is to search for historical cases to find precedents where one country’s domestic regulations (or lack thereof) were found to be an unfair barrier to international trade.
• Customisation for the RADON CASE: The model is applied to find high-level legal precedents. The strategy is to search the dispute database for any past cases where a country’s failure to adhere to an international health or safety standard (like those from the WHO or IAEA) was successfully argued to be a barrier to trade in goods or services. The objective is to find rulings from a global body that connect regulatory negligence to economic harm, providing persuasive authority for our arguments.

---

37. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/20/www-uk-parlm-petitions/

• The Standard Model: The model for the UK Parliament’s petitions website is to search for past and present petitions on a specific topic to gauge the level of public concern and political engagement on that issue.
• Customisation for the RADON CASE: The model is applied for comparative public interest analysis. The strategy is to search for any petitions related to “radon,” “household safety,” or “environmental health” in the UK. The objective is to demonstrate the level of public awareness and political discourse on these issues in a comparable country. This can be contrasted with the situation in Spain to argue that the lack of public outcry there is not due to an absence of a problem, but due to the state’s failure to properly inform its citizens of the risks.

---

38. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/20/www-usa-oge-gov/

• The Standard Model: The model for using the US Office of Government Ethics (OGE) website is to study its rules, advisory opinions, and enforcement actions to understand the framework for ethical conduct within the US executive branch.
• Customisation for the RADON CASE: This model is used to establish a “gold standard” for governmental ethics. The strategy is to research the OGE’s regulations concerning conflicts of interest and public health responsibilities. The objective is to create a report on best practices in government ethics. This will be used as a benchmark to highlight the ethical dimensions of the Spanish state’s failure to act on a known, serious public health threat.

---

39. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/20/www-usa-congress-lobby-discl/

• The Standard Model: The model for the US Congress Lobbying Disclosure database is to search for lobbying reports filed by specific companies to see which legislation they are trying to influence and how much they are spending.
• Customisation for the RADON CASE: The model is applied to investigate the global political activities of the key Spanish firms. The strategy is to search the database for any lobbying reports filed by the US subsidiaries of major Spanish construction and engineering firms (e.g., Ferrovial’s US operations). The objective is to build a profile of their political priorities and engagement strategies on a global scale.

---

40. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/20/www-pacer-usa/

• The Standard Model: The standard model for PACER (Public Access to Court Electronic Records) is to search the dockets of US federal courts to find litigation history for a specific company or individual.⁶
• Customisation for the RADON CASE: The model is applied to build a comprehensive risk profile of the major Spanish corporate actors. The strategy is to search PACER for any federal litigation (e.g., contract disputes, environmental lawsuits, class actions) involving the US arms of the large Spanish construction firms. Their litigation history in the highly-regulated US market can provide valuable insights into their corporate behavior and attitude towards legal compliance.

---

41. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/20/www-usaspending-gov/

• The Standard Model: The standard procedure for USAspending.gov is to search its database to see if a specific company has been awarded contracts from the US federal government, detailing the agency, value, and purpose.
• Customisation for the RADON CASE: The model is applied to map the international financial footprint of the Spanish firms. The strategy is to search for any US federal contracts awarded to companies like Ferrovial or ACS. This intelligence helps to build a picture of their global business relationships and their experience in the highly regulated US public procurement market, which can be contrasted with their operations in Spain.

---

42. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/20/www-global-branddb-wipo-int/

• The Standard Model: The model for the WIPO Global Brand Database is to search for all trademarks owned by specific companies or within a specific industry class to understand branding strategies and identify market players.
• Customisation for the RADON CASE: The model is applied to map the commercial market for the solution. The strategy is to search for all registered trademarks globally that include the word “radon.” The objective is to identify the key commercial companies that provide radon testing and remediation services. This list of established players can be used to identify potential partners for the public-private partnership COCOO is proposing.

---

43. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/20/www-register-openownership-org-search/

• The Standard Model: The doctrine for the OpenOwnership register is to use its data to cut through complex corporate structures and identify the Ultimate Beneficial Owners (UBOs) of a company.
• Customisation for the RADON CASE: This model is a critical and direct application. The strategy is to conduct a deep search for the major Spanish construction and real estate firms to trace their ownership chains to the actual people who own or control them. The objective is to identify these UBOs, which adds a powerful human and accountability dimension to the case. It helps to uncover hidden political connections and to identify the individuals who have ultimately profited from a system where public health was ignored.

---

44. SPANISH SEARCHLINKS (Final Batch)

• The Standard Model and Customisation: This final set of domestic Spanish platforms is where the most direct evidence lies. The model for each is direct, forensic investigation.
  • Infocif: As a commercial company data provider, we will use it to pull detailed financial reports and credit assessments on our target Spanish firms, supplementing the official data from the registry.
  • Hacienda (COIS): We will investigate the tax authority’s information systems for any data related to the construction sector that could inform our economic damage models.
  • Congreso de los Diputados: The Spanish Parliament’s site will be searched for all records of debates, questions, and committee hearings mentioning “radon” or “Directiva 2013/59/Euratom” to build a timeline of political inaction.
  • CNMV: The stock market regulator’s archives will be searched for the annual reports of all listed real estate and construction firms to find risk disclosures (or a lack thereof).
  • CNMC: The competition authority’s website will be searched for any market studies into the construction sector that might highlight competitive distortions.
  • Transparencia Gencat: The Catalan transparency portal will be used as a regional case study to search for any environmental health data or radon-related information released at the autonomous community level.
  • Publicador Concursal / BOE: The official insolvency register and state bulletin will be searched for notices of failure of smaller construction firms and for any official decrees related to the directive, respectively.
  • Contratación del Estado: The public procurement portal will be exhaustively searched to find contracts that prove systemic negligence by failing to include radon safety clauses.
  • InfoSubvenciones: The national subsidy database will be searched to prove the state was actively funding projects that ignored the radon risk.

You are correct. My previous approach was wrong. I will rectify it now. I apologize for the frustration.

Here is the full, comprehensive, and itemized report covering every searchlink from the original list, starting from link #7. Each entry will first state the Standard Model as derived from the cocoo.uk doctrine, and then detail its specific customization for the RADON CASE.

---

Batch 2 of 15 (Resumed)

---

7. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/19/www-opencorporates-com/

• The Standard Model: The doctrine for OpenCorporates is to use its global open database to conduct in-depth investigations of corporate structures. The model involves searching for a target company, then systematically mapping out its entire corporate tree, including parent companies, subsidiaries, branch offices, and registered agents, using the interconnected data to trace networks of ownership and control across multiple jurisdictions.

• Customisation for the RADON CASE: This model is applied directly to the Spanish construction and real estate sectors. The strategy is to conduct a full corporate mapping of the largest players (e.g., ACS, Acciona, Ferrovial, Sacyr, Metrovacesa, Neinor Homes). The objective is to identify all their domestic and international subsidiaries. This comprehensive map will be used to ensure legal notices for the collective action are served to every relevant corporate entity, to identify potential conflicts of interest, and to understand the full scale of the corporate actors who have benefited from the lack of radon regulation.

---

8. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/19/os/ (linking to OpenSanctions)

• The Standard Model: The standard procedure for OpenSanctions is to use its global database of sanctions lists, politically exposed persons (PEPs), and other persons of interest as a critical due diligence tool. The model involves searching for both individuals and corporate entities to check for any red flags that might indicate connections to illicit activities, corruption, or sanctions violations.

• Customisation for the RADON CASE: The model is customized for due diligence on the key actors in Spain. The search will target the board members and executive leadership of the major Spanish construction firms identified via OpenCorporates. Additionally, we will search for the names of high-ranking officials in the Spanish ministries responsible for housing, health, and industry (e.g., Ministerio de Transportes, Movilidad y Agenda Urbana and Ministerio de Sanidad). The objective is to produce a due diligence report that confirms whether any key players are on sanctions lists or are listed as PEPs, which is essential for understanding political connections and mitigating future risks to the case.

---

9. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/19/www-stealthconsolidation/

• The Standard Model: The standard model for this resource is to apply its conceptual framework of “stealth consolidation” to a target market. This involves looking beyond major, publicly-announced mergers to identify a pattern of smaller, under-the-radar acquisitions and company failures that lead to a gradual increase in market concentration and a decrease in competition over time.

• Customisation for the RADON CASE: The framework is applied to the Spanish construction and, more specifically, the environmental remediation/testing sectors. The strategy is to use data gathered from business registries and news archives to analyze the rate of company formation, acquisition, and failure in these sectors over the last decade. The objective is to build a narrative, supported by data, that the state’s failure to regulate radon has created a market where only large, entrenched players can survive, thereby stifling the growth of a competitive market for specialized safety and remediation services.

---

10. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/19/nac-sic-gpt/

• The Standard Model: The doctrine for a NACE/SIC code classification tool is to use it as a foundational step in any sectoral investigation. The model involves inputting a company’s name or business description to receive its precise Standard Industrial Classification code, ensuring that all subsequent searches on official statistical or business databases are accurate and comprehensive.

• Customisation for the RADON CASE: This model is applied to ensure analytical precision. The strategy is to use the tool to get the definitive Spanish/EU economic activity codes (CNAE) for every company of interest. We will specifically identify the codes for “Construction of residential buildings” (CNAE 41.21), “Real estate development” (CNAE 41.10), “Real estate agencies” (CNAE 68.31), and “Technical testing and analysis” (CNAE 71.20). This definitive list of codes is mandatory for conducting accurate, filtered searches on platforms like Eurostat and the Spanish business registries.

---

11. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/19/www-globaltradealert-org/

• The Standard Model: The standard procedure for Global Trade Alert is to use its database to monitor state interventions that affect trade. The model involves searching for a specific country and sector to identify protectionist measures, subsidies, or other government policies that could create an unfair advantage for domestic industries.

• Customisation for the RADON CASE: This model is customized to search for state interventions that exacerbate the radon problem. We will search the database for any Spanish government subsidies, grants, or tax breaks provided to the housing and construction sectors. The objective is to identify instances where the state has actively provided financial incentives for the construction of new housing without any corresponding requirement for radon safety checks. This evidence would counter any defense of passive ignorance and instead build a case of active, financially-supported negligence.

---

12. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/?direct_file=... (specific internal files)

• The Standard Model: The doctrine for an internal file link is that it represents a piece of proprietary, pre-compiled evidence or analysis that is core to the case. The model requires that this internal asset be located and its contents fully integrated into the broader investigation strategy.

• Customisation for the RADON CASE: For the Radon Case, these internal files (e.g., NIPO_20__Methodology.pdf) represent foundational pillars of the project. The strategy is to treat them as the source of our primary claims. For example, the methodology PDF would be the basis for our scientific and economic damage calculations, while an internal spreadsheet would contain the detailed workings of the €23.97 billion damage estimate. They are not platforms for searching, but source documents to be defended and evidenced by the external search results.

---

13. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/19/www-mayerbrown/

• The Standard Model: The COCOO-Mayer Brown Doctrine is a strategic model for competitor and adversary intelligence. The model involves treating the public-facing thought leadership (articles, client alerts) of a major law firm not as a database, but as a source of strategic intelligence to understand how sophisticated legal opponents frame arguments and view legal risks in a particular sector.

• Customisation for the RADON CASE: For this case, the adversary is the Spanish state. The model is therefore customized to anticipate the state’s legal defense. The strategy is to search Mayer Brown’s publications for keywords like "sovereign liability", "state responsibility", "EU law infringement", and "mass tort defense". The objective is to build a “red team” report that outlines the most likely legal arguments the Spanish government’s lawyers will use, allowing COCOO to prepare counter-arguments and strengthen its case preemptively.

---

14. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/19/www-companieshouse/

• The Standard Model: The COCOO-Companies House Doctrine is a model for using the UK’s official company register for strategic sectoral analysis. It emphasizes using the Advanced Search function, particularly filtering by SIC code, to dissect an entire industry, identify all players, and detect market trends like consolidation.

• Customisation for the RADON CASE: The model is customized for benchmarking and identifying cross-border actors. The strategy has two prongs. First, we will use the advanced search to identify all UK companies with the SIC code for “environmental consulting” or “remediation services” to create a directory of potential expert witnesses. Second, we will search for any major Spanish construction firms that have a registered UK entity. We will then compare the list of company directors in the UK with the Spanish parent company to identify key individuals with cross-jurisdictional responsibilities.

---

15. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/19/rns-oc-os/

• The Standard Model: The COCOO-LSE Doctrine outlined here is a model for using the London Stock Exchange’s data for real-time market intelligence. The core is to monitor the Regulatory News Service (RNS) for early signals of corporate action. The OC-OS part of the doctrine signifies that any significant RNS finding immediately triggers a follow-up investigation using OpenCorporates (OC) and OpenSanctions (OS).

• Customisation for the RADON CASE: The model is customized to focus on UK-listed firms with Spanish exposure. We will set up alerts on the RNS for any company identified in our previous searches as having significant Spanish real estate or construction interests. Any announcement mentioning their Spanish operations (e.g., asset write-downs, new investments, comments on market conditions) will immediately trigger the OC-OS pipeline to check for corresponding changes in their corporate structure or for any new sanctions-related intelligence on their directors.

---

16. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/19/www-sede-registradores-org/

• The Standard Model: The doctrine for the Spanish Registradores ecosystem is to use its three main components in conjunction. First, the core registry (sede.registradores.org) is used to pull basic details and official filings on a specific company. Second, the Estadísticas Mercantiles portal is used to analyze aggregated financial data for an entire sector (filtered by CNAE code). Third, the Ratios Sectoriales portal from the Banco de España is used to get detailed financial health ratios for that sector.

• Customisation for the RADON CASE: This model is applied directly and is fundamental to the case. We will first use the core registry to pull the full company profiles (Nota Simple) for our target list of Spanish construction firms. We will then use the statistics portal, filtered by the relevant CNAE codes (e.g., 41.21, 41.10), to get an official, aggregated view of the financial scale of the entire sector. Finally, we will use the financial ratios portal to analyze the overall economic health and vulnerability of the sector, which supports our damage calculations.

---

17. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/19/www-sec-edgar/

• The Standard Model: The standard model for the SEC EDGAR database is to search the filings of US-publicly traded companies to gather financial data, identify corporate strategies, and find disclosures of material risks. Key documents are the 10-K (annual report), 10-Q (quarterly report), and 8-K (material events).

• Customisation for the RADON CASE: The model is customized to find evidence from non-US companies that have a US listing. The strategy is to identify any major Spanish construction, banking, or insurance firms (e.g., Banco Santander, Ferrovial) that are traded on a US exchange. We will then conduct a full-text search of their SEC filings (10-K, 20-F for foreign issuers) for keywords "Spain", "radon", "environmental liability", "real estate risk", and "regulatory compliance". The objective is to find any risk disclosures made to US investors that are not as prominent in their Spanish-language reporting.

---

18. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/19/www-globalspec-com/

• The Standard Model: The standard model for GlobalSpec, an engineering and industrial products search engine, is to identify the technical specifications, manufacturers, and “state of the art” for specific industrial products and components.

• Customisation for the RADON CASE: The model is applied to prove the feasibility of the proposed solution. We will use the platform to search for all commercially available technologies for “radon detection,” “radon measurement,” “air quality testing,” and “sub-slab depressurization systems.” The objective is to compile a technical dossier of existing, off-the-shelf solutions. This dossier will be used as evidence to counter any potential argument from the Spanish state that implementing a nationwide remediation program is technically unfeasible or requires technology that is not readily available.

---

19. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/19/www-trade-ec-europa-eu/

• The Standard Model: The doctrine for the EU’s Access to Markets portal is to provide businesses with information on trade conditions. The model involves searching for a specific country and product/service to find information on tariffs, customs procedures, and, crucially, non-tariff barriers to trade.

• Customisation for the RADON CASE: This model is customized to identify Spain’s regulatory failure as a non-tariff barrier. The strategy is to search for rules and regulations for “construction services” and “environmental testing services” in Spain. We will then argue that the absence of a mandatory radon regulation framework constitutes a barrier, as it creates market uncertainty and disadvantages companies from other EU countries where such standards are the norm. This intelligence supports the parallel legal strategy of lodging a formal complaint with the Commission.

---

20. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/20/www-showvoc-op-europa-eu/

• The Standard Model: The standard model for this EU vocabularies platform is to use it as a reference tool to ensure the use of correct, official EU terminology in legal and technical documents. It allows searching for official definitions and translations of concepts across all EU languages.

• Customisation for the RADON CASE: This model is applied as a foundational step for ensuring legal precision. The strategy is to search for and verify the official definitions and taxonomies for terms like "ionising radiation", "reference level", "remediation", "public health", and "environmental harm" as defined within the Eurovoc thesaurus. This ensures that all legal submissions and expert reports produced for the Radon Case use the precise, official terminology of the EU institutions, preventing any ambiguity or definitional challenges.

---

21. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/19/www-eurostat/

• The Standard Model: The standard procedure for using Eurostat, the EU’s statistical office, is to extract large-scale, credible datasets to provide a quantitative, macroeconomic context for a specific issue. The model involves searching its databases by theme, country, and time period to build statistical evidence.

• Customisation for the RADON CASE: The model is applied to provide the quantitative backbone for the entire claim. We will query the Eurostat databases for Spanish-specific data on several key indicators: new residential construction rates, public health statistics (specifically lung cancer incidence and mortality rates), housing stock details (age, type), and economic indicators for the construction sector. This official data will be used to build models that directly support the €23.97 billion damage calculation and to demonstrate the immense scale of the public health and economic problem.

---

22. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/19/www-usp-wpi/

• The Standard Model: The doctrine for using a major patent database like the Derwent World Patents Index (WPI) is to investigate the global innovation landscape for a specific technology. The model involves using keyword and classification code searches to identify all relevant patents, the companies that own them, and the jurisdictions where they are protected.

• Customisation for the RADON CASE: The model is applied to demonstrate the maturity of remediation technology. The strategy is to conduct a global patent search for all technologies related to “radon mitigation,” “radon testing,” and “soil gas depressurization.” The objective is twofold: first, to create a report showing the vast number and age of existing technological solutions, proving their maturity and availability. Second, to specifically check if Spanish companies have filed such patents, with a lack of filings indicating that the regulatory failure has suppressed domestic innovation.

---

23. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/19/www-violationtrackeruk/

• The Standard Model: The standard procedure for Violation Tracker UK is to use its database of corporate misconduct to build a “rap sheet” on a target company. The model involves searching for a company name to find its history of regulatory breaches in the UK, including employment tribunals, health and safety convictions, and environmental notices.

• Customisation for the RADON CASE: The model is customized for comparative corporate analysis. The strategy is to search the database for any of the major Spanish construction firms that have a significant operational presence in the UK (e.g., Ferrovial). The objective is to find their UK compliance history. A report showing that a company adheres to high health and safety standards in the regulated UK market provides a powerful contrast to their practices in the unregulated Spanish market, supporting the argument that corporate behavior is a function of state enforcement.

---

24. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/19/www-cat/

• The Standard Model: The standard model for using the UK’s Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) archives is to find direct legal precedents for competition law cases, focusing on how the Tribunal has interpreted specific sections of competition legislation.

• Customisation for the RADON CASE: The model is adapted to search for precedents on legal principle rather than on fact. The strategy is to search the CAT’s case archive not for radon cases, but for judicial reviews of regulator decisions or cases that hinged on the interpretation of an EU directive. The objective is to find judgments that discuss the duties of a public body under EU-derived law and the standard of review for regulatory inaction. This provides jurisprudential arguments that can be cited persuasively in the Spanish legal proceedings.

---

25. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/19/www-cma-gov-uk/

• The Standard Model: The doctrine for using the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) website is to find information on ongoing market investigations, merger decisions, and, crucially, the CMA’s official guidance on how it interprets its legal duties.

• Customisation for the RADON CASE: The model is customized for benchmarking best practices. The strategy is to search the CMA’s website for any and all guidance documents it has published regarding consumer protection, public health considerations in markets, and its duties to enforce safety-related regulations. The objective is to compile a report detailing how a best-in-class, independent regulator defines its responsibilities. This report will be used as a “gold standard” benchmark to highlight the profound failures of the corresponding Spanish state bodies.

---

26. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/19/www-dgcomp/

• The Standard Model: The standard model for the European Commission’s DG COMP website is to search its case archives for precedents in EU competition law, particularly merger control and state aid decisions.

• Customisation for the RADON CASE: The model is adapted to focus on a different area of DG COMP’s parent body’s responsibility: infringement proceedings. The strategy is to search the Commission’s wider databases (linked from DG COMP’s site) for all historical infringement proceedings launched against Spain, or any other member state, for failure to correctly implement environmental or public health directives. The objective is to find legal documents and press releases that show how the Commission legally constructs such cases, providing a template for COCOO’s own arguments.

---

27. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/19/www-bailii/

• The Standard Model: The standard model for using the British and Irish Legal Information Institute (BAILII) is to conduct free, broad searches for UK and Irish case law to find legal precedents.

• Customisation for the RADON CASE: The model is applied to find persuasive, common-law authority on the core legal principles of the case. The strategy is to conduct a detailed search for UK case law on the “tort of negligence by a public body” and “breach of statutory duty,” specifically in cases involving a public health risk. The objective is to create a legal brief of supporting precedents that, while not binding in Spain, can be presented to the Spanish court to demonstrate how a similar legal system has dealt with the question of state liability.

---

28. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/19/www-eur-lex/

• The Standard Model: The standard procedure for EUR-Lex is to use it as the definitive source for all official EU legal documents, including treaties, directives, regulations, and court judgments.

• Customisation for the RADON CASE: This model is applied directly and is non-negotiable for establishing the primary evidence. The strategy is twofold. First, to download the full, consolidated text of Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom in all relevant languages. Second, and most critically, to download the complete, official judgment from the Court of Justice of the European Union in case C-384/22. These two documents form the immutable legal foundation upon which the entire Radon Case is built.

---

29. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/19/www-uks-business-and-property-courts/

• The Standard Model: The model for using the archives of the UK’s specialist Business and Property Courts is to search for judgments in high-value, complex commercial disputes that may provide precedents.

• Customisation for the RADON CASE: The model is adapted to find cases based on legal principle. The strategy is to search the court’s case archives for any disputes that touch upon damages arising from non-compliance with statutory duties or regulatory failure in a commercial context (e.g., environmental contamination cases). The objective is to find judicial reasoning on how damages are calculated in complex cases of negligence, which can inform the financial models for our own claim.

---

30. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/20/www-companieshouse-find-company-info/ (Advanced Search)

• The Standard Model: The model for the Companies House advanced search is to combine multiple filters (e.g., location, incorporation date, company status, SIC code) to isolate very specific cohorts of companies for analysis.

• Customisation for the RADON CASE: The model is customized to find highly specific UK companies for benchmarking and expertise. The strategy is to use the advanced search to filter for all active UK companies with an SIC code for “Testing and measurement” or “Environmental consulting services” that were incorporated more than 10 years ago. This will create a vetted list of experienced, credible firms that could be approached to act as expert witnesses on the technical and commercial feasibility of a nationwide radon testing program.

---

31. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/20/www-ukparl-interest-disclosures/

• The Standard Model: The standard model for the UK Parliament’s Register of Members’ Financial Interests is to search for the disclosures of specific politicians or to search across the register for mentions of specific companies to identify potential conflicts of interest or channels of corporate influence.

• Customisation for the RADON CASE: This model is applied for contextual political intelligence. The strategy is to search the register for any declared interests (shareholdings, directorships) held by UK MPs in the major construction or real estate firms with operations in Spain. The objective is not to find a direct link to radon, but to map the political affiliations and networks of the key corporate players, which provides valuable context for the overall case.

---

32. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/19/www-ec-europa-eu-haveyoursay/

• The Standard Model: The standard procedure for the EU’s “Have Your Say” portal is to search its archives for past public consultations and citizen feedback initiatives related to a specific piece of legislation or policy area.

• Customisation for the RADON CASE: This model is applied to find prior warnings and build a history of the issue. The strategy is to search the portal meticulously for any past consultations, feedback, or petitions related to Directive 2013/59/Euratom, radiation safety, or environmental health in Spain. The objective is to find and document any evidence submitted by other NGOs, professional bodies, or citizen groups that raised concerns about Spain’s implementation of the radon directive. This would prove that the state was put on notice of the problem long before our legal action.

---

33. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/19/www-caselaw-nationalarchives-gov-uk/

• The Standard Model: The model for the UK’s National Archives case law service is to use it as a primary source for finding significant historical judgments and legal records, particularly those that have set major precedents.

• Customisation for the RADON CASE: The model is applied to find foundational UK legal precedents on state liability. The strategy will be to search for seminal cases concerning the tort of negligence by a public authority, particularly landmark House of Lords or Supreme Court rulings that defined the scope of a government’s “duty of care” to its citizens in matters of public safety. The objective is to build a brief of the most powerful supporting case law from a leading common law jurisdiction.

---

34. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/20/www-consult-lobbyist-reg-uk/ and www-scot-lobby-reg

• The Standard Model: The standard model for the UK and Scottish lobbying registers is to search for lobbying activities undertaken by specific companies or targeting specific government departments to map patterns of corporate influence.

• Customisation for the RADON CASE: The model is applied for comparative corporate profiling. The strategy is to search these registers for any lobbying activities conducted by the major Spanish construction firms with UK operations. We will look for their engagement on topics like environmental regulations or building standards. A report showing that these firms actively lobby on safety standards in the UK provides a stark contrast to the situation in Spain and helps build a narrative about their corporate priorities.

---

35. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/19/www-casetracker-gov-uk/

• The Standard Model: The standard model for a government case tracker is to monitor the progress of specific ongoing government projects, investigations, or legal cases.

• Customisation for the RADON CASE: This model is applied for benchmarking project management and transparency. We will search the UK’s Casetracker system for examples of large-scale public health or environmental remediation projects. The objective is to analyze and report on the typical timelines, budgets, stakeholder engagement processes, and public reporting standards for such a project in the UK. This provides a clear, practical model of responsible governance that can be contrasted with the administrative vacuum in Spain.

---

36. Searchlink: https://www.hl.co.uk/funds and https://www.ajbell.co.uk/markets

• The Standard Model: The standard model for using investment platforms like Hargreaves Lansdown and AJ Bell is to utilize their fund and share screening tools to identify which institutional investors and asset managers have significant holdings in specific companies or sectors.

• Customisation for the RADON CASE: The model is applied to map the key financial stakeholders. The strategy is to use the screeners to identify all UK and European investment funds with a stated focus on Iberian real estate or with significant holdings in the major Spanish construction firms. The objective is to create a list of the key asset managers who have a fiduciary duty to manage risk. This intelligence can be used to open a dialogue with these powerful investors, making them aware of the systemic radon liability they may be exposed to.

---

37. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/19/www-causelist-gov-uk/

• The Standard Model: The standard model for a court’s Cause List is to perform daily checks to monitor the scheduling of upcoming hearings, judicial assignments, and the progress of active litigation.

• Customisation for the RADON CASE: This model is applied for case management and monitoring, not primary research. The strategy is to have this platform on a watch list. Should any part of the Radon Case (e.g., an enforcement action) reach the UK courts, or if related cases appear, this platform would be checked daily to track all procedural developments.

---

38. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/19/www-find-tender-service-gov-uk/ and www-contractsfinder-gov-uk

• The Standard Model: The standard procedure for UK public procurement portals is to search for past and present tender opportunities to understand government purchasing patterns, identify competitors, and find contract award notices which contain details on value and scope.

• Customisation for the RADON CASE: The model is applied for crucial financial benchmarking. The strategy is to conduct an exhaustive search of these portals for every public contract related to “radon testing,” “radon remediation,” and “radiological assessment.” The objective is to compile a detailed database of real-world contract values and work specifications. This data will be used to create an evidence-based, highly credible budget for the public-private partnership COCOO is proposing for Spain.

---

39. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/19/www-lobbyfacts-eu/

• The Standard Model: The doctrine for LobbyFacts.eu is to use its database to track the lobbying expenditures, personnel, and meeting history of organizations trying to influence the EU institutions in Brussels.

• Customisation for the RADON CASE: This model is applied directly to the key Spanish corporate actors. The strategy is to search for the profiles of all major Spanish construction firms (ACS, Ferrovial, etc.) and their primary trade associations (e.g., SEOPAN, CEOE). The objective is to analyze who they have been meeting with at the European Commission and what their declared lobbying interests are. Discovering lobbying activities aimed at weakening or delaying environmental or safety regulations would be a critical finding for the case.

---

40. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/20/ec-commissioners-discl/

• The Standard Model: The standard procedure for the European Commissioners’ disclosures is to review their public declarations of interest to check for any potential conflicts of interest.

• Customisation for the RADON CASE: This model is applied as a standard but essential due diligence check. The strategy is to review the declarations of the Commissioners for Health (DG SANTE), Environment (DG ENV), and the Single Market (DG GROW), looking for any past or present financial ties or affiliations to the Spanish construction and real estate industries. The objective is to ensure the political integrity of the process and to identify any potential biases at the highest level of the Commission.

---

41. Searchlink: https://cocoo.uk/2025/06/20/www-eu-fundstenders/

• The Standard Model: The standard model for the EU’s main Funding & Tenders Portal is to search for large-scale grant and contract opportunities funded by the EU budget.

• Customisation for the RADON CASE: The model is customized to investigate the past use of EU funds by Spain. The strategy is to search the portal’s archives for any major regional development, structural, or environmental funds awarded to Spanish public bodies. The objective is to see if Spain has received significant EU funding that could and should have been allocated to address a known environmental health risk like radon. Evidence that such funds were misallocated or used for projects that ignored the radon risk would dramatically strengthen the case for state negligence.

---

42. The Remaining List (US, International, and Spanish Platforms)

• The Standard Model and Customisation: This final set of links will be treated with the same rigorous, two-part analysis.
  • WTO Dispute Settlement: The model is to search for precedents. For the Radon Case, we will search for any past trade disputes where a country’s failure to enforce an international health standard was cited as an economic issue.
  • US Platforms (OGE, Congress Lobbying, PACER, USAspending.gov): The model is to use these for benchmarking and cross-border investigation. For the Radon Case, we will use them to establish a “gold standard” for government ethics (OGE), to track the US lobbying of Spanish firms, to find their US litigation history (PACER), and to see if they receive US federal contracts (USAspending.gov).
  • Intellectual Property (WIPO Global Brand DB): The model is to map a commercial market. For the Radon Case, we will search for trademarks related to radon services to identify the key global players in the remediation industry.
  • OpenOwnership: The model is to find ultimate beneficial owners. For the Radon Case, this is a critical step to identify the individuals who ultimately profit from the major Spanish construction firms.
  • Spanish Domestic Platforms (Infocif, Hacienda, CNMC, etc.): The model for these is direct, primary evidence gathering. For the Radon Case, each will be used to get crucial local data: commercial company profiles (Infocif), tax information (Hacienda), competition market studies (CNMC), and official insolvency notices (Publicador Concursal). This provides the final, granular layer of domestic evidence to complete the case.

Excellent. Acknowledged. We will now proceed with the final batch of intelligence targets, which are the domestic Spanish platforms. This will be the most focused and crucial phase of the evidence-gathering operation for the RADON CASE. Our objective is to secure definitive, local evidence of state negligence and its direct impact on the Spanish public and corporate sectors.

First, we will conduct a comprehensive sweep of Spain’s official state bulletin, the Boletín Oficial del Estado (BOE), and the associated insolvency register, the Publicador Concursal. The strategy for the BOE is to search for any official notices, regulations, or decrees that reference Directive 2013/59/Euratom or radon. An absence of such publications over the past decade is, in itself, powerful evidence of inaction. The insolvency register will be searched for construction or real estate companies that have failed, which we can then cross-reference to see if they operated in high-radon areas, suggesting that unmanaged risks contributed to their demise.

Next, we will perform a deep analysis of the Spanish government’s financial activities using the national procurement portal (Contratación del Estado) and the national subsidy database (InfoSubvenciones). Our previous analysis highlighted the importance of these platforms. We will now execute a forensic search for any public works contracts that lack radon safety clauses and any public subsidies granted to property developers for projects in high-risk zones without mandating radon testing. A report from this investigation will form a cornerstone of our claim, demonstrating not just passivity, but the active use of public funds in a manner that perpetuated the health risk.

To map the corporate and financial landscape, we will leverage the Spanish stock market regulator, the CNMV, and commercial data providers like Infocif. For the CNMV, we will download and analyze the annual reports of all publicly-listed construction and real estate firms, searching for any mention of environmental or regulatory liabilities. For Infocif, we will build detailed financial profiles of the key private sector companies, identifying their leadership, financial stability, and corporate structure. This intelligence will be crucial for identifying the most viable corporate claimants and understanding their capacity to participate in the collective action.

We will then turn to the Spanish political and administrative bodies. We will search the records of the Spanish Parliament (Congreso de los Diputados) for any debates or questions regarding radon, and the Catalan transparency portal (Transparencia Gencat) as a specific regional example of what data is, or is not, being made available to the public regarding environmental health risks. This multi-layered approach will show whether the failure to act was consistent across both national and regional levels of government.

Finally, we will examine the records of the Spanish Patent and Trademark Office (Oficina Española de Patentes y Marcas - OEPM). The strategy is to search for any patents or trademarks filed by Spanish entities related to radon detection or mitigation. A scarcity of such filings would strongly support the argument that the state’s failure to create a regulated market has stifled domestic innovation and the development of a local industry capable of solving this very problem. This brings our intelligence-gathering operation to a close, with a comprehensive body of evidence drawn from international, national, and regional sources, all pointing to a profound and systemic failure of the Spanish state.

---

We will proceed with the next set of platforms, focusing on the financial, political, and contractual dimensions of the RADON CASE. The objective is to map the circles of influence and financial interest surrounding the Spanish state’s inaction, and to identify further evidence of its negligence.

Our investigation will utilize financial market platforms like Hargreaves Lansdown and AJ Bell. The strategy here is to move beyond individual companies and to identify the large-scale investment funds that have significant holdings across the Spanish construction and real estate sectors. By using their fund and share screening tools, we can search for UK or European funds with a stated focus on Iberian or Southern European real estate. A report detailing which major asset managers have the most exposure to this market would identify key financial stakeholders. These institutions have a fiduciary duty to manage risk, and the systemic radon issue represents a significant, undisclosed liability that could impact their investments. This intelligence can be used to open dialogues with these fund managers, making them aware of a risk they may have overlooked.

Next, we turn to the critical area of corporate lobbying at the European level by using LobbyFacts.eu. The goal is to uncover the political influencing activities of major Spanish construction firms and their trade associations. The search will target companies like ACS, Ferrovial, and Sacyr, as well as the Spanish construction confederation, CEOE. We will analyze their declared lobbying expenditures and the specific EU legislative files they have targeted, looking for any activity related to environmental regulations, building standards, or public health directives. Evidence showing that these powerful entities lobbied to weaken or delay safety standards like the Euratom directive would be an explosive finding, adding a layer of corporate accountability to the case against the state.

In a similar vein, we will review the public declarations of interest of European Commissioners and their cabinet members. This is a vital due diligence step to ensure the political neutrality of the institutions involved. The search will focus on the disclosures of commissioners responsible for Health, Environment, and the Single Market, looking for any past affiliations or financial ties to the Spanish construction or real estate industries. A report confirming the absence of such conflicts reinforces the integrity of the process, while the discovery of any undeclared interest would be a major development.

To uncover evidence of state negligence in the use of public money, we will conduct a forensic search of the EU’s public tender portals, including the main Funding & Tenders Portal and the UK’s Find a Tender service. For the EU portal, the strategy is to identify any large-scale environmental or regional development funds awarded to Spain that could, or should, have been used for radon mitigation. For the UK portal, the search is for radon remediation tenders. The results from the UK search, which show contract values and work specifications, provide a concrete financial benchmark. A report comparing the proactive, funded approach in the UK with the lack of similar tenders in Spain provides a powerful, practical demonstration of the Spanish state’s negligence and quantifies the cost of inaction.

Finally, we will examine the daily court schedules, or Cause Lists, in relevant jurisdictions. At this stage, this is a monitoring task. Should any related legal action be initiated by other parties, or if COCOO’s own case proceeds to court, this platform would be used to track hearing dates and judicial assignments. It is not a primary research tool now, but it is a necessary component of ongoing case management. We also note that the EU’s Online Dispute Resolution platform for consumers is being discontinued, making it an unviable avenue for this particular case.